Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA H100 PCIe

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA H100 PCIe

AI GPU We compared a Professional market GPU: 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 and a GPU: 80GB VRAM H100 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 350W)
NVIDIA H100 PCIe 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1755MHz vs 1700MHz)
More VRAM (80GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2039GB/s vs 1638GB/s)
7936 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI210
22.63 TFLOPS
H100 PCIe +126%
51.22 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2021
Release Date
Mar 2022
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Tesla Hopper
Professional
Type
AI GPU
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1095 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1755 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1593 MHz

Memory

64GB
Memory Size
80GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
1638GB/s
Bandwidth
2039GB/s

Render Config

104
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
114
6656
Shading Units
14592
416
TMUs
456
0
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
456
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.12 GPixel/s
707.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
800.3 GTexel/s
181.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
204.9 TFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
51.22 TFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
25.61 TFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
350W
700 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GH100
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
4 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
80 billion
Unknown
Die Size
814 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
N/A
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy