AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 and 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (64GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 1.02TB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1746MHz vs 1700MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI210
+68%
22.63 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
13.41 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2021
Release Date
Nov 2018
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1746 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
64GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1638GB/s
Bandwidth
1.02TB/s
Render Config
104
Compute Units
60
-
SM Count
48
6656
Shading Units
3840
416
TMUs
240
0
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.7 GPixel/s
707.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
181.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.705 TFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
300W
700 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
Vega 20
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GLXT
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
7 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
Unknown
Die Size
331 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
N/A
Shader Model
6.7
