Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (436.2GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI25 +471%
12.29 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Aug 2015
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1400 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
852 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
256bit
436.2GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1024
256
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
384.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
24.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
GM204
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy