Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 8GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 68.29GB/s)
12288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (15W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250 +3435%
45.26 TFLOPS
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
1.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Mar 2023
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
LPDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
68.29GB/s

Render Config

208
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
13312
Shading Units
1024
832
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
32
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.560 TFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1280 GFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
640.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
15W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GA10B
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
N/A
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy