Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
13304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250 +205627%
45.26 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370M
0.022 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Aug 2008
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
208
Compute Units
-
13312
Shading Units
8
832
TMUs
4
0
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.200 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
G98
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
NB9M-GLM
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
Unknown
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
20W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy