Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
12864 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (500W vs 900W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250 +4302%
45.26 TFLOPS
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jul 2011
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

208
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
13312
Shading Units
448
832
TMUs
56
0
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
900W
900 W
Suggested PSU
1300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GF100
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
Unknown
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy