Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
12928 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250 +7812%
45.26 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

208
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
13312
Shading Units
384
832
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
55W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GK107
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
Unknown
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy