Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 84% (1700MHz vs 924MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
12288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250 +2292%
45.26 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000 SE
1.892 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Oct 2016
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
823 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
924 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

208
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
13312
Shading Units
1024
832
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.57 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.14 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.892 TFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.14 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GM204
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
N/A
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy