Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
13072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla C1060 's Advantages
Lower TDP (188W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250 +7176%
45.26 TFLOPS
Tesla C1060
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Apr 2009
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
512bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

208
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
13312
Shading Units
240
832
TMUs
80
0
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
188W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GT200B
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy