Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
14032 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X +44224%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Apr 2011
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s

Render Config

220
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
14080
Shading Units
48
880
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
32W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GT216
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
N/A
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy