Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
14064 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X +101751%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380M
0.047 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jan 2010
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
220
Compute Units
-
14080
Shading Units
16
880
TMUs
8
0
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.424 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.848 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
46.98 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GT218
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
N10M-GLM
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
Unknown
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
25W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
N/A
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy