Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
13952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X +12872%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
0.369 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Mar 2007
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
1536MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

220
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
14080
Shading Units
128
880
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
368.6 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
171W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
G80
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
90 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
Unknown
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy