Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 46% (1700MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
13312 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X +2580%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Apr 2016
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
796 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

220
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
14080
Shading Units
768
880
TMUs
48
0
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GM206
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
Unknown
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
N/A
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy