Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 4GB VRAM Quadro M4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
12800 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X +1817%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro M4000M
2.496 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Aug 2015
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

220
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
14080
Shading Units
1280
880
TMUs
80
0
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.00 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.496 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
100W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GM204
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
N16E-Q3-A1
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
N/A
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy