Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1700MHz vs 1493MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 200.2GB/s)
12800 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X +1152%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro P2200
3.822 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jun 2019
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
5GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5X
8192bit
Memory Bus
160bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
200.2GB/s

Render Config

220
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
14080
Shading Units
1280
880
TMUs
80
0
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.72 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
119.4 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
59.72 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.822 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
119.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GP106
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
16 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
N/A
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy