AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1700MHz vs 1569MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 230.9GB/s)
11520 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X
+495%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Max Q
8.033 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2021
Release Date
Feb 2018
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1316 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
220
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
14080
Shading Units
2560
880
TMUs
160
0
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
100W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Aldebaran
GPU Name
GP104
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
16 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
N/A
Shader Model
6.4
