Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro VX 200

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro VX 200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 512MB VRAM Quadro VX 200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
13968 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X +18896%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro VX 200
0.252 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro VX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

220
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
14080
Shading Units
112
880
TMUs
56
0
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
252.0 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
G92
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
Unknown
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy