Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
13888 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 600W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300 +10261%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Mar 2009
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

220
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
14080
Shading Units
192
880
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
16
880
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

600W
TDP
108W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
153 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy