Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
13888 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 600W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300 +14584%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Aug 2014
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM3
Memory Type
DDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

220
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
14080
Shading Units
192
880
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
880
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

600W
TDP
35W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
153 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy