Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
13696 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 600W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300 +8268%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM3
Memory Type
DDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
220
Compute Units
-
14080
Shading Units
384
880
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
16
880
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
153 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

600W
TDP
55W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy