AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300 and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
13632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (238W vs 600W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300
+4556%
47.87 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Jul 2011
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
220
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
14080
Shading Units
448
880
TMUs
56
0
ROPs
48
880
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
600W
TDP
238W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
153 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
