Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300X and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5171GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
19448 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI300X +389042%
81.72 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
May 2009
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM3
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
5171GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
304
Compute Units
-
19456
Shading Units
8
1216
TMUs
4
0
ROPs
4
1216
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
153 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

750W
TDP
23W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy