Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
15360 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 750W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI325X +923%
81.72 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2024
Release Date
Mar 2016
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2100 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2525 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

288GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
HBM
8192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
10.3TB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

304
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
19456
Shading Units
4096
1216
TMUs
256
0
ROPs
64
1216
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
256 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
2554 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
653.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
81.72 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

750W
TDP
300W
1150 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Aqua Vanjaram
GPU Name
Capsaicin
-
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
CDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
153 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
1017 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy