Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI60 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI60 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI60 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI60 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1024GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
4048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI60 +11514%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Aug 2008
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1800 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1024GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
4096
Shading Units
48
256
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
460.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
7.373 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
65W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Vega 20
GPU Name
G94
Vega 20 GL
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy