Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI60 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI60 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI60 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI60 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1024GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
4088 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI60 +64030%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Aug 2008
Radeon Instinct
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1800 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1024GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
4096
Shading Units
8
256
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
460.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
7.373 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
12W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Vega 20
GPU Name
G98
Vega 20 GL
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy