Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI8 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI8 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI8 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI8 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
4088 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI8 +35517%
8.192 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2016
Release Date
Aug 2008
Radeon Instinct
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
4096
Shading Units
8
256
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

175W
TDP
12W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
G98
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy