Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs AMD FireStream 9270

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (85W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 5300 +252%
4.224 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Nov 2008
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
800
80
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
132.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
8.448 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.224 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
264.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
RV770
Navi 14 PRO XE
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy