Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 605 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 14.35GB/s)
1232 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 5300 +4124%
4.224 TFLOPS
GeForce 605 OEM
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Apr 2012
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
897 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.35GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
1280
Shading Units
48
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
132.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
8.448 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.224 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
264.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
GF119
Navi 14 PRO XE
GPU Variant
GF119-200-A1
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy