Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 555 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT

AMD Radeon Pro 555 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro 555 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 9650M GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 555 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (81.60GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 555 +1436%
1.306 TFLOPS
GeForce 9650M GT
0.085 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Aug 2008
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 9M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1275 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
81.60GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
768
Shading Units
32
48
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

13.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
40.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
1306 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
84.80 GFLOPS
81.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
23W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Polaris 21
GPU Name
G96C
Polaris 21 PRO
GPU Variant
NB9P-GT
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy