Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 555 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

AMD Radeon Pro 555 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro 555 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 81.60GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 555
1.306 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q +88%
2.458 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Apr 2020
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1275 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
81.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

13.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
40.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
1306 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
81.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Polaris 21
GPU Name
TU117
Polaris 21 PRO
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy