Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI FireGL V8600

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI FireGL V8600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (159W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +1201%
5.728 TFLOPS
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
May 2007
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
320
144
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
159W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
R600
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy