Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD FirePro W9000

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +43%
5.728 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
2048
144
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
274W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Tahiti
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy