CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon RX 470
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon RX 470
VS
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
AMD Radeon RX 470
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 470 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 211.2GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 470 's Advantages
Boost Clock1206MHz
Lower TDP (120W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+15%
5.728 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 470
4.94 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
VS
Radeon RX 470
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Aug 2016
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Arctic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
926 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1206 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1650 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
211.2GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
36
Compute Units
32
2304
Shading Units
2048
144
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.59 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
154.4 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.940 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.940 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
308.7 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
Polaris 10 PRO (215-0876204)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
120W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon 780M vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
2
AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
3
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
4
ATI FireMV 2260 PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI Radeon HD 3470
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
8
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA T1000
9
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs MTT S70
10
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy