CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
VS
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega 56 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 's Advantages
Boost Clock1471MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (210W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5.728 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega 56
+84%
10.54 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
VS
Radeon RX Vega 56
Graphics Card
Apr 2017
Release Date
Aug 2017
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1156 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1471 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
409.6GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
36
Compute Units
56
2304
Shading Units
3584
144
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
94.14 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
329.5 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.09 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.54 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
659.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
Vega 10
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL (215-0894216)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
210W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon 780M vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
2
AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
3
NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
4
ATI FireMV 2260 PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI Radeon HD 3470
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
8
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI Radeon X1700 SE
9
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs Intel Arc Pro A40
10
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GK107
Related News
1
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
2
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
3
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
4
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
5
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
6
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
7
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
8
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
9
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
10
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy