Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 32MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 32 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 250W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
32MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
-
144
TMUs
2
32
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
15W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
VSA-101
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
180 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy