Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs Intel Arc A780

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs Intel Arc A780

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 16GB VRAM Arc A780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (2200MHz vs 1500MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 483.8GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (200W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V320
10.75 TFLOPS
Arc A780 +67%
18.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
2200 MHz
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
945 MHz
Memory Clock
1093 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6X
2048bit
Memory Bus
256bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
559.6GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
4096
224
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
563.2 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
36.04 TFLOPS
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.02 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.253 TFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
200W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
DG2-512
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy