Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
3488 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V320 +4379%
10.75 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Apr 2009
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1536MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR2
2048bit
Memory Bus
192bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
3584
Shading Units
96
224
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
G92B
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
G92-159-B1
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy