Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs AMD FirePro V5900

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V320 +1650%
10.75 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
May 2011
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
256bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
512
224
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

230W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Cayman
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
GCN 5.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy