Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 230W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jul 2005
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
256bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
-
224
TMUs
12
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
83W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
NV41
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Curie
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
130 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy