Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9500 GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 16.13GB/s)
3552 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V320 +12115%
10.75 TFLOPS
GeForce 9500 GS
0.088 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jul 2008
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
504 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR2
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
16.13GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
3584
Shading Units
32
224
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
88.00 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
40W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
G96
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
G96-259-A1
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Tesla
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
UMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy