Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT X2

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3464 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V320 +5498%
10.75 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT X2
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Jul 2007
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
120
224
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
Unknown
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
RV630
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy