Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs AMD Radeon HD 6290

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs AMD Radeon HD 6290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3504 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V320 +10236%
10.75 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6290
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Dec 2011
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
-
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
-
945 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
2048bit
Memory Bus
64bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

56
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
80
224
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

230W
TDP
19W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Cedar
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
Cedar LE
GCN 5.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy