Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2 vs ATI FirePro V3800

AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2 vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro V7350X2 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1243MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1904 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V7350X2 +1001%
5.728 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1188 MHz
Base Clock
-
1243 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
400
144
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

200W
TDP
43W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Redwood
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy