Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro V7350X2 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1243MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2088 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V7350X2 +968%
5.728 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Sep 2008
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1188 MHz
Base Clock
-
1243 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
2304
Shading Units
216
144
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
182W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
GT200
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy