Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2 vs AMD Radeon R9 270

AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2 vs AMD Radeon R9 270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro V7350X2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 34% (1243MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V7350X2 +141%
5.728 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 270
2.368 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2013
Radeon Pro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1188 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1243 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
1280
144
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.368 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Curacao
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy