Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64X and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 123% (1468MHz vs 657MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega 64X +1092%
12.03 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760M
1.009 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2019
Release Date
May 2013
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1250 MHz
Base Clock
628 MHz
1468 MHz
Boost Clock
657 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
768
256
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

93.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.51 GPixel/s
375.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.05 GTexel/s
24.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.03 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1009 GFLOPS
751.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.05 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
GK106
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
N14E-GL-A1
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Kepler
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy