Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1720MHz vs 1665MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 475W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega II +372%
14.09 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2019
Release Date
Apr 2019
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Apple MPX
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1574 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
1720 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
806 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
825.3GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
4096
Shading Units
896
256
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

110.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
440.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
28.18 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
14.09 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
7.045 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

475W
TDP
75W
850 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vega 20
GPU Name
TU117
Vega 20 XT
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy