Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II and 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 112.9GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 475W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega II +3295%
14.09 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2019
Release Date
Dec 2009
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Apple MPX
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1574 MHz
Base Clock
-
1720 MHz
Boost Clock
-
806 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1792MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
448bit
825.3GB/s
Bandwidth
112.9GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
4096
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

110.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.50 GPixel/s
440.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.15 GTexel/s
28.18 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.09 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
7.045 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

475W
TDP
182W
850 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 20
GPU Name
GT200B
Vega 20 XT
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy