Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
3856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 's Advantages
Lower TDP (219W vs 475W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega II +1990%
14.09 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275
0.674 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2019
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Apple MPX
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1574 MHz
Base Clock
-
1720 MHz
Boost Clock
-
806 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
448bit
825.3GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
4096
Shading Units
240
256
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

110.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
440.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
28.18 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.09 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
673.9 GFLOPS
7.045 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
84.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

475W
TDP
219W
850 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 20
GPU Name
GT200B
Vega 20 XT
GPU Variant
G200-105-B3
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy