Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Lower TDP (275W vs 475W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega II +96%
14.09 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY
7.168 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2019
Release Date
Jul 2015
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Apple MPX
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1574 MHz
Base Clock
-
1720 MHz
Boost Clock
-
806 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
825.3GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

64
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
3584
256
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

110.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
440.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
224.0 GTexel/s
28.18 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.168 TFLOPS
14.09 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.168 TFLOPS
7.045 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
448.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

475W
TDP
275W
850 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Vega 20
GPU Name
Fiji
Vega 20 XT
GPU Variant
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
GCN 5.1
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy